With the rapid development of technology, human life has become more convenient than ever before. However, this progress often comes at the cost of environmental degradation. Factories emit harmful gases, plastic waste pollutes oceans, and deforestation destroys habitats. Although technology itself is not evil, how we use it determines its impact.

Take electric vehicles (EVs) as an example. While they reduce air pollution by replacing gasoline cars, their batteries require rare metals like lithium. Mining these metals damages ecosystems. This paradox shows that sustainable solutions must balance technological advancement with ecological protection.

Governments and individuals can make a difference. Renewable energy sources such as solar panels should replace fossil fuels. Recycling programs need stricter enforcement. If everyone adopts eco-friendly habits, like using reusable bags, technology and nature may eventually thrive together.

一、高级词汇替换技巧

例句对比

• 原句: Technology causes many problems.

• 升级句: Technological advancement creates a paradox between convenience and sustainability.

二、复杂语法结构

1. 非谓语动词作状语

• 原句: People use plastic bags and throw them away.

• 升级句: Using plastic bags casually, people contribute to white pollution.

2. 虚拟语气表建议

• 结构: If + 主语 + were to..., 主语 + would...

• 例句: If governments were to invest more in green energy, air quality would improve.

3. 倒装句强调

• 原句: We can solve this problem only by working together.

• 升级句: Only by working together can we solve this problem.

三、议论文逻辑框架

四、学术写作手法

1. 数据增强说服力

• 模糊表达: Many animals are dying because of pollution.

• 具体化: According to WWF, over 100 million marine creatures die annually from plastic waste.

2. 对比论证

• 结构: Whereas/While A..., B...

• 例句: Whereas traditional industries rely on coal, green technology harnesses wind and solar power.

3. 让步反驳法

• 句型: Admittedly, ... However, ...

• 例句: Admittedly, technology improves efficiency. However, its environmental cost cannot be ignored.

五、批判性思维训练

1. 多角度分析问题

• 经济角度: green technology creates jobs

• 伦理角度: future generations' right to a healthy planet

2. 预判反方观点

• 反方论点: "Environmental protection slows economic growth"

• 反驳策略: 引用"绿色GDP"概念 (long-term benefits > short-term profits)

易错点提醒

1. 从句引导词混淆

• 错误: This is the city where pollution is serious.

• 正确: This is the city where pollution is serious. (不可用which)

2. 复杂句结构错误

• 错误: Only when people realize the importance they will act.

• 正确: Only when people realize the importance will they act. (倒装)

3. 学术用词过度

• 避免: "The anthropogenic factors exacerbate the ecosystem." (过于生硬)

• 改进: "Human activities severely damage ecosystems."

延伸练习建议

1. 主题辩论：组织"Should plastic be banned completely?"正反方辩论

2. 图表描述：根据碳排放数据图写分析报告

3. 利弊分析：写一篇"AI对环境的影响"双面论证文