From different levels including methodology , constitutional theory and ideology of criminal law , this article carries out a jurisprudential inspection on the debate between the formalistic interpretation theory and the substantial interpretation theory .
The problems of efficacy lost in cooperative learning in class for college students are usually manifested in as follows : being formalistic and empty of stuff , teacher-student separation and short of communication ; being rash for success and lacking thinking ; abuse and wrong use and being devoid of aim .
This article claims that the debate between the formalistic interpretation theory and the substantial interpretation theory is the conflict between the principle of legality and social harmfulness theory , and that is also the dispute between the formalistic idea and the substantial idea on criminal law .
Multiple discriminant analysis showed that the linear combination of creativity 's six dimensions was able to discriminate the participants with formalistic thinking and those with postformal thinking , which echoed the argument describing the corresponding relationship between postformal thinking and creative performance .
This narrow formalistic approach was justified on the ground that it taught students how to state , analyze , evaluate and compare concrete fact situations thus developing their powers and skills of analysis , reasoning , and expression .
On one hand it affects the style and the content of the popular culture , on the other hand it is molded by the popular culture , and weakens people 's reasoning ability , making interest become formalistic and reject the contents .
Because the party and the nation valued highly and democracy upsurged , jury system had been carried out very good in individual period . In majority period , because of the left route , political and judicial centralization , and the system design , jury system or was abandoned , or its performance became formalistic .